An unexplained payment, a false account of ownership or an altered invoice can change a commercial disagreement into a suspected fraud case. Before choosing a legal response, establish exactly what was said or done, who relied on it and how the money or property changed hands. A loss is the starting point for investigation, rather than proof of a particular offence.
Businesses seeking criminal lawyer Dubai advice should prepare a transaction chronology alongside the relevant contracts and accounting records. The assessment should identify any criminal allegation and the separate basis for recovering money. These questions overlap, but each requires evidence and a suitable procedural route.
Reconstruct the transaction before assigning a label
Identify the people and entities involved, the representations made and the authority each person claimed. Record when documents were supplied, payments authorised and concerns first raised. Distinguish what the business knew at the time from information discovered later.
Ask whether the problem concerns a false representation, subsequent misuse of entrusted funds, an allegedly forged document or failure to perform an agreement. The timing and character of the conduct matter. A genuine business relationship can involve a later alleged offence, while a failed transaction may remain a civil dispute despite serious financial consequences.
Preserve explanations from the other side, including those that appear inconvenient. A change in specifications, approved payment instruction or disputed reconciliation may affect the legal assessment. Advice based only on selected messages can miss the issue that determines the case.
Match the alleged conduct to the relevant offence
Article 451 of the Crimes and Penalties Law addresses obtaining property, benefits or specified documents through fraudulent methods, a false name or a false capacity capable of deceiving the victim and inducing delivery. It also covers specified harmful dealings with property where the person knows that ownership, authority or a previous disposition prevents the transaction.
The complaint should therefore explain the alleged deceptive act and its connection to the transfer or benefit. A promise that was not fulfilled does not, without more, establish the statutory elements. Identify the evidence of deception rather than describing every unpaid invoice as criminal fraud.
Breach of trust requires a different analysis. Article 453 addresses appropriation, use or dissipation of movable assets to the rights holder's detriment after entrustment through specified relationships, including agency. Counsel should examine the purpose for which the property was delivered and the alleged departure from that purpose.
Forgery also has its own elements. Article 251 concerns changing the truth in a document by a prescribed method, capable of causing harm and with intent to use it as genuine. Article 258 addresses knowing use of a forged document. Identify who created, altered or used the document and what each person knew.
Examine the role of electronic communications
Where deception occurs through an information network, electronic system or information technology tool, Article 40 of the Cybercrime Law may require consideration. It addresses unlawful acquisition through fraudulent methods, a false name or false capacity using those means. The applicable charge depends on the conduct and evidence.
Preserve complete email chains, message exports, attachments and the original payment instruction. Record account details and any changes to them. If access to a business system may have been compromised, obtain technical advice about preserving records while securing the system. Avoid altering the material that may explain how the instruction reached the payer.
Choose the civil remedy with care
Civil relief should be connected to a recognised legal basis. The current Civil Transactions Law took effect on 1 June 2026. Article 4 addresses temporal application, so the relevant transaction and event dates must be checked before applying its provisions to an older dispute.
Articles 170 and 171 address deception, including deliberate silence where the deceived party would not have contracted had the concealed circumstance been known. Article 172 permits annulment where deception is accompanied by gross unfairness. The legal team should establish the conditions for the particular remedy rather than assuming that any inaccurate statement automatically invalidates the contract.
A claim may instead concern contractual nonperformance. Under Article 234, the other party to a reciprocal contract may seek performance or termination following default and notice, subject to judicial assessment. Compensation requires its own basis. Article 245 also separates civil liability from criminal responsibility and the effect of punishment.
Identify who suffered the loss and who holds the right being enforced. A company payment does not automatically become a shareholder's personal claim. Review the agreement, corporate records and any guarantee before naming the claimant and defendants.
Coordinate civil and criminal proceedings
Under Article 23 of the Criminal Procedures Law, a person suffering direct personal harm from an offence may claim civil rights during the specified stages, up to closure of pleadings before the criminal court. Such a claim cannot first be introduced before the appellate court and requires payment of the judicial fees.
Article 40 makes clear that a complainant is not treated as claiming civil rights unless that intention or a compensation request is expressed in the complaint or a later submission. A criminal report should therefore not be assumed to include a properly presented compensation claim.
Article 27 provides for referral to the competent civil court where deciding compensation would require a special investigation delaying the criminal case. Article 29 governs suspension of related civil proceedings pending a final criminal judgment and preserves urgent precautionary measures. Ask how these provisions apply to the actual proceedings; reporting an allegation alone should not be presented as automatically suspending every commercial claim.
Prove the amount and meaning of the loss
Prepare a calculation linking each claimed amount to the alleged conduct. Separate transferred funds, repayments, goods received and additional loss. Explain the documents supporting each entry and avoid counting the same loss twice under different descriptions.
The Evidence Law recognises electronic evidence and its production, including emails and other electronic records. It also permits expert appointment for technical issues. Preserve original material and provide an organised explanation of the accounting questions an expert may need to examine. A screenshot or spreadsheet total should not replace the underlying record.
A final criminal judgment can have binding effect on specified issues before the civil courts under Article 269 of the Criminal Procedures Law. That effect has statutory qualifications and does not itself establish every item of compensation or secure actual payment. Ask counsel to distinguish the judgment's findings from the remaining civil issues.
INTERPOL reported on 24 September 2025 that Korean and Emirati authorities recovered USD 3.91 million sent to an illegitimate Dubai bank account after a Korean steel company identified forged shipping documents. This was one documented recovery through international cooperation. It does not establish a typical recovery rate, time frame or result for a private fraud claim.
Respond carefully if the allegation is against you
Preserve contracts, approvals and records showing what you understood, received and authorised. Identify relevant witnesses and explain gaps honestly to your legal adviser. Do not create retrospective documents or delete messages because they appear unfavourable.
For a criminal lawyer Dubai consultation, distinguish the company’s position from your personal involvement. Article 98 addresses counsel's attendance at investigation and access to papers, subject to the prosecution's stated investigation interest exception. Obtain advice about the actual stage and required response rather than assuming unrestricted access at every point.
Agree a written scope for the engagement. Articles 46 and 49 of the legal profession law address written fees before the work and the assignment covered. Clarify whether the proposal includes the criminal complaint or defence, a related civil claim, expert work and later enforcement.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is an unpaid business debt always criminal fraud?
No. Nonpayment may support contractual remedies, but a criminal allegation requires the elements of the relevant offence. Explain the alleged deception or misuse and provide evidence linking it to the transfer, benefit or entrusted property.
2. Does a criminal conviction guarantee full compensation?
No. The civil claim, its procedural requirements, the loss calculation and actual recovery still require attention. A criminal judgment may bind the civil court on specified matters, but it should not be treated as proof of every amount claimed.
3. What should a business prepare for the first meeting?
Bring the full agreement, a dated chronology, payment records, relevant communications and the other party's explanation. In a criminal lawyer Dubai consultation, ask for the proposed allegation, civil remedy, missing evidence and any immediate procedural deadline.
4. How should a business record a disputed change to bank details?
Preserve the original instruction and the full email or message chain, including attachments and any verification records. Note when the change was received, who approved it and which account received payment. Keep the other party's explanation with the records rather than relying on an isolated screenshot.
5. What should a loss calculation show before proceedings are considered?
List each payment, repayment, credit and item received, with the supporting document and date. Explain how the alleged conduct caused each claimed loss and flag estimates separately. The calculation should allow the legal team to identify disputed items and avoid counting the same loss under several descriptions.
About the author
Dr. Hassan Elhais is a Senior Legal Consultant at Amal Al Rashedi Lawyers and Legal Consultants in Dubai. He advises on UAE family, civil, commercial and criminal law matters.
Related Links
About the Author
Dr. Hassan Elhais publishes analysis of UAE criminal law matters, including fraud allegations, financial transactions and related criminal-law disputes. For readers researching a fraud lawyer in Dubai, his writing offers insight into the legal questions surrounding these topics. Explore his published work and practice-area information for further context.
Copyright © of this article is retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. We explicitly grant you permission to download a copy, without any alteration, of this article
for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or any charge. This article can be utilized on your website or for marketing, however, we grant you permission
to host this article on your website and no other rights. This content should not be altered in any way or sold commercially in any format without prior permission of the copyright holder.
During reference of this article, full biographic details entailing the name of the author, his designation, the institute and the publishing date of the article shall be provided.
